February 23, 2012

Passing on Items of Relatively Low Value to Your Loved Ones

This week’s question:

I have several items of fairly low value that I want to pass on to my children.  The problem is that if I list them in my will and then change my mind, it may cost more than they are worth for my attorney to change my will.  Is there any way around this?

/s/Stephanie S.

Almaden Valley

 

Dear Stephanie—

I can understand your predicament, Stephanie.  From your point of view, the attorney’s fees for a new will or codicil or amendment to your present will made cost more than some of the items are worth.

Fortunately, the California legislature has been aware of this problem as well.  In 2006, the legislature enacted Probate Code §6132, entitled “Writing Directing Disposition of Tangible Personal Property.”

This law basically states that your will may refer to a writing that directs disposition of tangible personal property.  There are a few exceptions, such as money that is common coin or currency and property used in a trade or business.  And there are some monetary limitations.

So, what you might want to do is to leave a list of which items pass on to what people if something happens to you and make sure that the list is referred to in the will.  You will also want to make sure the list is kept up to date.

I would also check with my attorney to make sure that my will refers to the list and that the list of items is proper in all respects.  Then, you may be able to just change the recipient names or the items as time goes on.

If you would like to read the key provision authorizing such a list, you can go online with your favorite search engine and enter California Probate Code Section 6132.

You will see that the will needs to be unrevoked, i.e. it must be your current, valid will.  Also, the writing needs to be dated and either in your own handwriting or the list needs to be signed by you, the testator or will maker.

Another requirement is that the writing must describe the items and the recipients of the property with reasonable certainty.  For example, I would think that “My wedding rings to my niece Patsy Faye” or “My toy car collection to my grandson Benjy” would be OK.

In this manner, if you change your mind later on about who gets what, you can just change the list without incurring the legal expense of a new will or codicil (amendment) of your current will.

Good luck with your list, Stephanie.  I hope it works out OK.

/s/Donald J. DeVries

Almaden Valley

 

Read our Terms of Use.

 

Preparing For Small Claims Court is Essential

This week’s question:

I loaned about $1,500 to a friend at work and now he says he cannot pay me back.  I had him sign a promissory note at the time.  I have asked him several times about it, but he just refuses to pay me.  Hiring a lawyer is probably too expensive.  Can I proceed in Small Claims Court?  What do I do to prepare properly?

/s/Kenny K.

Almaden Valley

Dear Kenny—

Sorry to learn about your predicament, Kenny.  If you have exhausted all (proper) means to collect the debt, Small Claims Court may be for you.

Before you go to the courthouse to file your claim, you will want to get your paperwork in order, and you should learn a little about Small Claims Court before you start that process.

If you go online with your favorite search engine you should find a wealth of information that is available.  One of my favorite web sites is the State Bar of California.  The State Bar web site has a number of consumer pamphlets available online and by mail.

One of those pamphlets is entitled “How Do I Use the Small Claims Court.” You can read it online at any time.  It is just excellent, and it is published by the State Bar.  Consumers can have a sense of satisfaction that it is from a objective qualified source and it is published for their best interests.  Other pamphlets are available as well.

The Small Claims pamphlet might be a little out of date in one respect, though.  It mentions in question two that the maximum claim is $7,500.  However, my copy of the California Code of Civil Procedure states in Section 116.221 that the maximum amount for individuals is ordinarily now $10,000.

After your homework is completed and your hearing has been set and the defendant served, you will want to prepare properly for the hearing.  Have a chronology typed out for yourself showing step by step what happened that you can refer to at the hearing.  During a court hearing, it is easy to forget key dates and events.

You will also want to have your key documents in order with a copy for the judge and a copy for your adversary.  I served as a temporary Small Claims judge many years ago and was favorably impressed when the parties had their case well organized.

At the hearing, you will want to be brief and to the point.  Answer the judge’s questions and then stop.  Don’t tell a big, long story that has nothing to do with the case.  Keep the tone civil and businesslike.

I’m sure you will do just fine.  And good luck!

/s/Donald J. DeVries

Almaden Valley

Read our Terms of Use.

Your Attorney Should Not Be Your Advocate and a Witness At Trial

This week’s question:

I have a very good attorney and I want her to testify on my behalf in our court case coming up.  She can take the stand just like anyone else and really to a good job, but she says she cannot do that and be my attorney at the same time.  Are there any rules on that?

/s/Nina N.
Almaden Valley

Dear Nina—

I can understand why you have raised this question, Nina, but the rule is fairly clear.  Allow me to explain this a bit.

There are different roles that people play in the courtroom.  One of those important roles is that of a witness.  Often that witness is a percipient witness, who would testify about things he or she perceived in the past.

Another important role in the courtroom is that of your attorney, or your advocate.  The problem is that these roles may be very different.

The basic rule is that one should not be both a witness and an advocate in the same proceeding.  This is known as the advocate-witness rule.  This rule was discussed at length in a recent court case entitled Kennedy v. Eldridge, from the Court of Appeal for the Third Appellate District in Sacramento.

In that case, the dispute was over an infant child. The child’s paternal grandfather was an attorney, representing his son, the father of the child.  The case was against the mother of the attorney’s grandson.

The Kennedy case was a very involved family situation with overlapping issues and competing interests.  The court discussed the advocate-witness rule and stated that the advocate-witness rule prohibits an attorney from acting both as an advocate and a witness in the same proceeding in most situations.

The Court of Appeal quoted an American Bar Association ethics provision that now states that a lawyer shall not act as advocate at a trial in which he lawyer is likely to be a necessary witness except in a very few limited situations.

The problem is that as a witness, the attorney must tell the truth, and as an advocate, the attorney’s job is to obtain the best result for the client.  Further, those duties may not necessarily be coextensive and where they are not, the attorney-witness may not choose between them.

In the Kennedy case, the court also said that the likelihood of conflict inherent in the dual status of the attorney-witness was indisputable.

Almaden Times readers can read the Kennedy case for themselves by entering the name of the case in their favorite search engine and hitting “go.”  Once again, the name of the case is Kennedy v. Eldridge.

/s/Donald J. DeVries
Almaden Valley

Read our Terms of Use.

Listing Your “Heirs” May Not Be As Easy As It May Seem

This week’s question:

My wife and I have a living trust, wills, and related documents, but I am curious about this question.  If I were to die, just who are my heirs? Where would my property go? Where can I go for more information about this topic?

/s/Henry H.
Almaden Valley

Dear Henry—

Thank you for emailing in that question. And it’s good to know that you and your wife already have a living trust, wills, and related documents. You should be in good shape legally if something were to happen to you.

Listing your heirs really depends on a lot of things. First of all, you would want to look at your legal residence, since many state laws are different. Let us assume you live in California when you die.

By the way, if a person dies without a will, we say that the person died “intestate.”

Next, you would look to see your marital status. If you are married, your surviving spouse has certain rights if you die without a will. Some of these rights are stated in California Probate Code §6401.

If a person dies as a single person, his or her property usually passes to the decedent’s “issue”, or children, in equal shares, under California Probate Code §6402(a), and if there is no surviving “issue”, to the decedent’s parent or parents equally.

If there is no surviving “issue” (children) or parent, then to the issue of the parents or either of them, i.e., brothers and sisters of the decedent, under Probate Code §6402(c).

Of course, there are provisions in the law for more remote relationships, just in case that becomes necessary. One can envision where it may be necessary to pass property interests to great grandchildren, or even first, second, or third cousins thrice-removed. Of course, the decedent may not have ever met these people.

A colorful chart showing some of these relationships can be found by going online to MyStateWill.com. You can readily see various “Degrees of Kinship by the Rules of Civil Law” prepared by the author of that work. A note of caution is needed, however, and that is to always determine what state the information applies to, since each state has different laws when it comes to trusts, wills, and related issues.

Another note of caution for our Almaden Times readers: you will always want to consult with your own attorney to see how these general legal principles may or may not apply to your particular situation. It seems like for every rule there are numerous exceptions, and only your own personal attorney can advise you properly.

/s/Donald J. DeVries
Almaden Valley

Read our Terms of Use.

Thinking About Becoming a Lawyer? Do Your Research First

This week’s question:

I am a freshman in college and I am thinking about becoming a lawyer. What do I need to do to become one? What are the educational requirements? How can I learn more about what lawyers do?

/s/Andy A.
Almaden Valley

Dear Andy:

Thanks for emailing in that question, Andy. This is a topic that is near and dear to my heart, as you might imagine. I have been doing this work for over 41 years now and still thoroughly enjoy it.

You can learn a bit more about what lawyers do, the educational requirements, and other topics by talking with a lot of people and doing a lot of reading about this field of work. The more you know, the better your decision might turn out to be.

A very good source of information is the State Bar of California. In this state, all practicing attorneys must be a member of the State Bar. Some states have a voluntary bar association, but here in California it is mandatory.

The State Bar publishes several excellent consumer-oriented pamphlets, one of which is entitled, “How Do I Become a Lawyer”. It is just a top-notch source of information that you might find interesting and informative.

Some of the topics in the pamphlet include, (1) What do lawyers do? (2) What are the requirements for admission to practice law in California (3) How do I prepare for law school? (4) What is the LSAT? And (5) Where can I find out more about becoming a lawyer?

The more you read and the more you learn by talking with others, the better position you will be in to determine if this might be a field of work for you. It seems to me that there is a vast range of career options available for one with legal training.

As is stated in the State Bar pamphlet, the pamphlet summarizes the general requirements for becoming a California lawyer. It also touches on the many opportunities available to those who pursue a legal career.

This field may not be for you, and becoming a lawyer—and practicing law—is not easy, but a career is law can be very rewarding.

You can read the pamphlet “How Do I Become a Lawyer” online by bringing up the California State Bar web site and entering pamphlets@calbar.ca.gov. Or, you can contact The State Bar of California, Office of Media and Information Services, 180 Howard Street, San Francisco, CA 94105-1639. Their telephone number is: 415-538-2000, and they may be able to mail you a copy of the pamphlet at little or no cost.

Best wishes in your career path, Andy.

/s/Donald J. DeVries
Almaden Valley

Read our Terms of Use.

Living Trusts Generally Do Not Require A Separate Tax I.D. Number

This week’s question:

My husband and I are thinking about drawing up a living trust and related documents but are concerned about the need for a separate tax identification number for the trust. We would both be trustees of our family trust. Can you shed some light on this topic?

/s/Jenny J.
Almaden Valley

Dear Jenny—

You have raised a very good question, Jenny. You must be concerned about the possibility of your trust needing separate annual fiduciary income tax returns, state and federal, with accompanying cost and nuisance factors.

Let us assume for the sake of discussion that you do in fact have a “living trust”. This is also called a “revocable” trust. (A few months ago an article appeared in this column pointing out the differences between revocable and irrevocable trusts which can be seen on my website.) The revocable trust or living trust is also known as a “grantor” trust.

You can think of the “grantor” of the trust as the “creator” of the trust, you and your husband. Other terms often used are the “settlor” of the trust or “trustor”. Sorry about all of this redundancy and possible confusion, that’s just the way it is.

Internal Revenue Code rules and Treasury Regulations generally provide that so long as the trust is a “grantor trust” and all income is distributed to or for the benfit of the grantor(s), no federal tax i.d. number (TIN) is required while the grantor, or at least one of the two grantors, serves as Trustee or Co-Trustee. If that is the case, the trust uses the grantor’s personal social social security number of either grantor as its TIN.

Thus, under the Treasury Regulations, if you and your husband have a typical living trust, you would continue to file your usual state and federal tax returns each year and report all income under your own social security numbers. In a sense, the trust is treated as one person for income tax reporting purposes.

As long as you and your husband are both living and filing your normal tax returns, then usually there would be no requirement to file separate state and federal fiduciary tax returns for the trust.

You will want to contact your own attorney, however, if part or all of the trust becomes irrevocable, through death or other means, or if someone else becomes trustee of your trust. Other exceptions apply too, for example, if the trust conducts a business as a sole proprietor. In those situations, a visit with your own attorney or CPA is essential.

Thank you for emailing in your question, Jenny. I think our Almaden Times readers will appreciate it.

/s/Donald J. DeVries
Almaden Valley

Read our Terms of Use.

Where To Store Your New Living Trust And Will Documents





This week’s question:

 

My wife and I are thinking about a new living trust, wills,

and other documents, including a durable power of attorney for asset management

and advance health care directive. It sounds like the volume of paperwork is

incredible! My question is a simple one: where do we store our documents once

they are all signed—at the attorney’s office?

 

/s/Larry L.

Almaden Valley

 

Dear Larry:

 

You have emailed in a very common question, Larry. At the

conclusion of most projects dealing with living trusts, wills, and related

documents, clients want to know about where to store the papers.

 

I think it is safe to say that practices vary a little bit

from office to office. Our practice has been for many years that we do not

like to retain original documents. We typically provide the originals and two

copies to the clients and we retain a copy of the signed documents for our

file.

 

With the advent of good photocopiers many years ago, there

is really no need for us as attorneys to retain the originals, and under the

California Evidence Code, a copy can usually be as good as the original.

 

We usually recommend that the clients place the original

documents in a very safe place, like a safety deposit at the bank and that they

retain at least one of the sets of copies at home for ready-reference.

 

A question that often arises is whether to give a copy to

the family, such as adult children or the Successor Trustee of the Trust and/or

Executor of the Will. We have found that this is a personal decision that

varies from family to family. Some clients like to keep all documents to

themselves, so to speak, and others like to provide copies to key individuals.

 

At the very least, key individuals, like the Successor

Trustee of the Trust and the Executor of the Will need to know where to find

the documents in case the need arises, like in a certain area of the home. 

Sometimes the key individuals are named and sign on bank deposit access cards

on file at the bank so as to have ready-access to the important documents in

times of need.

 

Of course, a copy of the Advance Health Care Directive

should be provided to the person’s doctors and hospitals, just in case

the need arises. In fact, hospitals are now required to ask if patients being

admitted have such a document. And for good reason.

 

Another good reason for clients to have copies of their

documents at home is for periodic review of them just to make sure they have

their legal papers in order. It is good to review them at least once a year if

not more frequently.

 

/s/Donald J. DeVries

Almaden Valley

 

Donald J. DeVries is an attorney practicing law in the

Almaden Valley. Past Almaden Times articles

since 1986 can be accessed through his web site: www.almadenvalleylawyers.com. If

you would like him to answer your question in his next Almaden Times column, you can reach him by

email at don@almadenvalleylawyers.com,

with “Almaden Times” in the subject line, fax at (408)268-6502,

telephone at (408)268-9500, or mail at DeVries & Horowitz, 6475 Camden

Avenue, Suite 200, San Jose, CA 95120. Your matters are personal and private,

so of course, he will not disclose your identity or any details about your

situation. Mr. DeVries writes this column to provide you with general

information about important legal matters affecting California

residents—not to give you legal advice about your specific matter. No

attorney-client relationship is created by these articles. The law is complex

and constantly changing and varies from state to state. So you should consult

an attorney before taking any action that would affect your personal or

business matters.

 

 

 

LEGAL MENTAL CAPACITY IS A RATHER TRICKY CONCEPT-PART 1 OF 2 PARTS





 

This week’s question:

My husband is getting up in years

and I am not sure he has the legal ability to sign a Living Trust. He can be

so forgetful, it’s scary. He still knows me, our children and our

properties, but how can I tell if it is OK for him to sign legal documents?

/s/Mary M

Dear Mary:

This is a very important topic,

Mary, and one that is not easily summarized.

Let me begin by mentioning a few

important California Probate Code sections, in this the first part of a

two-part series.

§810 states that there shall exist a

rebuttable presumption affecting

the burden of proof that all persons have

the capacity
to make decisions and to be responsible for their acts

or decisions. So, this is one of many factors to look at.

 

Next, a person who has a mental or physical disorder may still be capable of

contracting, conveying, marrying, making medical decisions, executing wills or

trusts, and performing other actions.

 

Also, a judicial determination that

a person is totally without understanding, or is of unsound mind, or suffers

from one or more mental deficits so substantial that, under the circumstances,

the person should be deemed to lack the legal capacity to perform a specific

act, should be based on evidence of a deficit in one or more of the person's mental functions rather than on a

diagnosis of a person's mental or physical disorder.

 

Of course a doctor may need to help with this assessment. 

Deficits in mental functions are defined in §811. Deficits in mental functions

include alertness and attention, including, but not limited to, the level of

arousal or consciousness and orientation to time, place, person, and

situation. 

 

Other issues include information processing, including, but

not limited to short- and long-term memory, including immediate recall, the

ability to understand or communicate with others, either verbally or otherwise

and recognition of familiar objects and familiar persons.

 

In looking at legal mental capacity, one would be interested

in the ability to understand and appreciate quantities, the ability to reason

using abstract concepts, and the ability to plan, organize, and carry out

actions in one's own rational self-interest.

 

Of course, the ability to reason logically is important.

Deficits in these functions may be demonstrated by the presence of severely

disorganized thinking, hallucinations, delusions and/or uncontrollable,

repetitive, or intrusive thoughts.

 

Other deficits in mental functions could be listed, and the

court may take into consideration the frequency, severity, and duration of

periods of impairment.

 

Thanks for writing in, Mary. Be on the lookout for Part 2

of this topic in about two weeks.

 

/s/Donald J. DeVries

Almaden Valley

 

Donald J. DeVries is an attorney practicing law in the

Almaden Valley. Past Almaden Times

articles since 1986 can be accessed through his web site: www.almadenvalleylawers.com

If you would like him to answer your question in his next Almaden Times column, you can reach him by

email at don@almadenvalleylawyers.com,

with “Almaden Times” in the subject line, fax at (408)268-6502,

telephone at (408)268-9500, or mail at DeVries & Horowtiz, 6475 Camden

Avenue, Suite 200, San Jose, CA 95120. Your matters are personal and private,

so of course, he will not disclose your identity or any details about your

situation. Mr. DeVries writes this column to provide you with general

information about important legal matters affecting California

residents—not to give you legal advice about your specific matter. No

attorney-client relationship is created by these articles. The law is complex

and constantly changing and varies from state to state. So you should consult

an attorney before taking any action that would affect your personal or

business matters.

 

 

 

 

Differences Between “Revocable” And “Irrevocable” Trusts Explained





 

This week’s question:

 

My parents live here in the Almaden Valley

and they have a living trust. My sister and I are very curious about what the

trust says but our parents say politely that it is none of our business. Since

our parents have said that my sister and I are the beneficiaries of the trust

and receive everything when they pass on, can’t we have a copy of the

trust and know all about it?

 

/s/Jimmy J.

Almaden Valley

 

Dear Jimmy:

 

You and your sister have some good questions, but your

parents’ business may be just that.

 

Since your parents are still living and presumably of

“sound mind”, they can presumably revoke (i.e., change, modify, or

cancel) any part of their trust. It is typically revocable during their lifetime.

 

Once one of your parents passes on, usually the trust

becomes “irrevocable”

as to the deceased person’s share, i.e., fixed, permanent, unchangeable.

 

Revocable living trusts are something like a will. And just

as a will “speaks” only as of the date of the testator’s

death, a revocable trust confers enforceable property interests in the

beneficiaries only at the time it becomes

irrevocable
. Prior to that time, those beneficiaries have no rights

to the trust property, and thus no say in how it is managed. Or even what is

in the trust.



 

California Probate Code §15800 sets forth the

rule: “Except to the extent that the trust instrument otherwise provides

or where the joint action of the settlor [creator of the trust] and all

beneficiaries is required, during the time that a trust is revocable and the

person holding the power to revoke the trust is competent: (1) The person

holding the power to revoke, and not the beneficiary, has the rights afforded

beneficiaries under this division.”



 



Any interest that beneficiaries of a revocable trust have in

trust property is “merely potential” and can “evaporate in a

moment at the whim of the settlor”. A settlor with revocation power

retains the power and control of the trust estate and can with a stoke of the

pen divest the beneficiaries of their interest. 



 



Be sure to discuss the above general principles with your

own attorney to see how they may apply to your own situation. There is really

no substitute for that. 



 



You may also find a recent case helpful online, decided

September 27, 2011. Go to your favorite search engine and enter: Estate of William A. Giraldin or Christine Giraldin v. Timothy Giraldin. It

should be up on your screen in a heartbeat. It may be a little tedious, but

it’s good reading.



 



/s/Donald J. DeVries



Almaden Valley



 



Donald J. DeVries is an attorney practicing law in the

Almaden Valley. Past Almaden Times

articles since 1986 can be accessed through his web site: www.almadenvalleylawers.com

If you would like him to answer your question in his next Almaden Times column, you can reach him by

email at don@almadenvalleylawyers.com,

with “Almaden Times” in the subject line, fax at (408)268-6502, telephone

at (408)268-9500, or mail at DeVries & Horowitz, 6475 Camden Avenue, Suite

200, San Jose, CA 95120. Your matters are personal and private, so of course,

he will not disclose your identity or any details about your situation. Mr.

DeVries writes this column to provide you with general information about

important legal matters affecting California residents—not to give you

legal advice about your specific matter. No attorney-client relationship is

created by these articles. The law is complex and constantly changing and

varies from state to state. So you should consult an attorney before taking

any action that would affect your personal or business matters.

 



 

 

Suing Your Lawyer After You Lost Your Case May Be Difficult





 

This week’s question:



 



I went to court with my attorney two months ago and we just

received the decision in the mail. We lost. My attorney told me she thought

we were going to win. Can I sue her for legal malpractice?



 



/s/Vanessa V.



Almaden Valley



 



Dear Vanessa—



 



As in so many situations, Vanessa, it all depends on the

situation. Just because you lost your case does not necessarily mean you have

a viable legal practice case, and/or one that is worth pursuing.



 



First of all, you need to have grounds for a legal

malpractice case. Some of those grounds are listed in common jury instructions

that a trial judge might read to the jury in that kind of case.



 



For example, the standard

of care
is covered by CACI 600 which states:



 



“An attorney is negligent if he or she fails to use

the skill and care that a reasonably careful attorney would have used in

similar circumstances.”



 



“When you are deciding whether the attorney was

negligent, you must base your decision only on the testimony of the expert

witnesses, who have testified in this case.”



 



And then, to recover money damages, the trial judge might

read CACI 601 to the jury:



 



“To recover damages from the attorney, plaintiff must

prove that plaintiff would have obtained a better result if the attorney had

acted as a reasonably careful attorney.”



 



Another jury instruction relates to “success”. 

It reads as follows:



 



“Success Not Required. An attorney is not necessarily

negligent just because his or her efforts are unsuccessful or he or she makes

an error that was reasonable under the circumstances. An attorney is negligent

only if he or she was not as skillful, knowledgeable, or careful as other

attorneys would have been in similar circumstances.”



 



It is also common to look at different strategies or legal

decisions that were involved in the case, but an attorney is not necessarily

negligent just because he or she chooses one legal strategy or makes a decision

and it turns out that another strategy or decision would have been a better

choice.



 



Also, a referral to a legal specialist may be important.



 



“Referral to Legal Specialist. If a reasonably

careful attorney in a similar situation would have referred plaintiff to a

legal specialist, then the attorney was negligent if he or she did not do so.”



 



“However, if defendant attorney handled the matter

with as much skill and care as a reasonable legal specialist would have, then

defendant attorney was not negligent.”



 



Best wishes in pursuing this, Vanessa. I regret your case

did not turn out so well for you.



 



/s/Donald J. DeVries



Almaden Valley



 



Donald J. DeVries is an attorney practicing law in the

Almaden Valley. Past Almaden Times

articles since 1986 can be accessed through his web site: www.almadenvalleylawers.com.  If

you would like him to answer your question in his next Almaden Times column, you can reach him by

email at don@almadenvalleylawyers.com,

with “Almaden Times” in the subject line, fax at (408)268-6502,

telephone at (408)268-9500, or mail at DeVries & Horowitz, 6475 Camden

Avenue, Suite 200, San Jose, CA 95120. Your matters are personal and private,

so of course, he will not disclose your identity or any details about your

situation. Mr. DeVries writes this column to provide you with general

information about important legal matters affecting California

residents—not to give you legal advice about your specific matter. No

attorney-client relationship is created by these articles. The law is complex

and constantly changing and varies from state to state. So you should consult

an attorney before taking any action that would affect your personal or

business matters.