May 19, 2012

Thinking About Becoming a Lawyer? Do Your Research First

This week’s question:

I am a freshman in college and I am thinking about becoming a lawyer. What do I need to do to become one? What are the educational requirements? How can I learn more about what lawyers do?

/s/Andy A.
Almaden Valley

Dear Andy:

Thanks for emailing in that question, Andy. This is a topic that is near and dear to my heart, as you might imagine. I have been doing this work for over 41 years now and still thoroughly enjoy it.

You can learn a bit more about what lawyers do, the educational requirements, and other topics by talking with a lot of people and doing a lot of reading about this field of work. The more you know, the better your decision might turn out to be.

A very good source of information is the State Bar of California. In this state, all practicing attorneys must be a member of the State Bar. Some states have a voluntary bar association, but here in California it is mandatory.

The State Bar publishes several excellent consumer-oriented pamphlets, one of which is entitled, “How Do I Become a Lawyer”. It is just a top-notch source of information that you might find interesting and informative.

Some of the topics in the pamphlet include, (1) What do lawyers do? (2) What are the requirements for admission to practice law in California (3) How do I prepare for law school? (4) What is the LSAT? And (5) Where can I find out more about becoming a lawyer?

The more you read and the more you learn by talking with others, the better position you will be in to determine if this might be a field of work for you. It seems to me that there is a vast range of career options available for one with legal training.

As is stated in the State Bar pamphlet, the pamphlet summarizes the general requirements for becoming a California lawyer. It also touches on the many opportunities available to those who pursue a legal career.

This field may not be for you, and becoming a lawyer—and practicing law—is not easy, but a career is law can be very rewarding.

You can read the pamphlet “How Do I Become a Lawyer” online by bringing up the California State Bar web site and entering pamphlets@calbar.ca.gov. Or, you can contact The State Bar of California, Office of Media and Information Services, 180 Howard Street, San Francisco, CA 94105-1639. Their telephone number is: 415-538-2000, and they may be able to mail you a copy of the pamphlet at little or no cost.

Best wishes in your career path, Andy.

/s/Donald J. DeVries
Almaden Valley

Read our Terms of Use.

Living Trusts Generally Do Not Require A Separate Tax I.D. Number

This week’s question:

My husband and I are thinking about drawing up a living trust and related documents but are concerned about the need for a separate tax identification number for the trust. We would both be trustees of our family trust. Can you shed some light on this topic?

/s/Jenny J.
Almaden Valley

Dear Jenny—

You have raised a very good question, Jenny. You must be concerned about the possibility of your trust needing separate annual fiduciary income tax returns, state and federal, with accompanying cost and nuisance factors.

Let us assume for the sake of discussion that you do in fact have a “living trust”. This is also called a “revocable” trust. (A few months ago an article appeared in this column pointing out the differences between revocable and irrevocable trusts which can be seen on my website.) The revocable trust or living trust is also known as a “grantor” trust.

You can think of the “grantor” of the trust as the “creator” of the trust, you and your husband. Other terms often used are the “settlor” of the trust or “trustor”. Sorry about all of this redundancy and possible confusion, that’s just the way it is.

Internal Revenue Code rules and Treasury Regulations generally provide that so long as the trust is a “grantor trust” and all income is distributed to or for the benfit of the grantor(s), no federal tax i.d. number (TIN) is required while the grantor, or at least one of the two grantors, serves as Trustee or Co-Trustee. If that is the case, the trust uses the grantor’s personal social social security number of either grantor as its TIN.

Thus, under the Treasury Regulations, if you and your husband have a typical living trust, you would continue to file your usual state and federal tax returns each year and report all income under your own social security numbers. In a sense, the trust is treated as one person for income tax reporting purposes.

As long as you and your husband are both living and filing your normal tax returns, then usually there would be no requirement to file separate state and federal fiduciary tax returns for the trust.

You will want to contact your own attorney, however, if part or all of the trust becomes irrevocable, through death or other means, or if someone else becomes trustee of your trust. Other exceptions apply too, for example, if the trust conducts a business as a sole proprietor. In those situations, a visit with your own attorney or CPA is essential.

Thank you for emailing in your question, Jenny. I think our Almaden Times readers will appreciate it.

/s/Donald J. DeVries
Almaden Valley

Read our Terms of Use.

Where To Store Your New Living Trust And Will Documents

This week’s question:

My wife and I are thinking about a new living trust, wills, and other documents, including a durable power of attorney for asset management and advance health care directive. It sounds like the volume of paperwork is incredible! My question is a simple one: where do we store our documents once they are all signed—at the attorney’s office?

/s/Larry L.

Almaden Valley

Dear Larry–

You have emailed in a very common question, Larry. At the conclusion of most projects dealing with living trusts, wills, and related documents, clients want to know about where to store the papers.

I think it is safe to say that practices vary a little bit from office to office. Our practice has been for many years that we do not like to retain original documents. We typically provide the originals and two copies to the clients and we retain a copy of the signed documents for our file.

With the advent of good photocopiers many years ago, there is really no need for us as attorneys to retain the originals, and under the California Evidence Code, a copy can usually be as good as the original.

We usually recommend that the clients place the original documents in a very safe place, like a safety deposit at the bank and that they retain at least one of the sets of copies at home for ready-reference.

A question that often arises is whether to give a copy to the family, such as adult children or the Successor Trustee of the Trust and/or Executor of the Will. We have found that this is a personal decision that varies from family to family. Some clients like to keep all documents to themselves, so to speak, and others like to provide copies to key individuals.

At the very least, key individuals, like the Successor Trustee of the Trust and the Executor of the Will need to know where to find the documents in case the need arises, like in a certain area of the home.

Sometimes the key individuals are named and sign on bank deposit access cards on file at the bank so as to have ready-access to the important documents in times of need.

Of course, a copy of the Advance Health Care Directive should be provided to the person’s doctors and hospitals, just in case the need arises. In fact, hospitals are now required to ask if patients being admitted have such a document. And for good reason.

Another good reason for clients to have copies of their documents at home is for periodic review of them just to make sure they have their legal papers in order. It is good to review them at least once a year if not more frequently.

/s/Donald J. DeVries

Almaden Valley

 

Read our Terms of Use.

Legal Mental Capacity is a Rather Tricky Concept – Part 1 of 2 Parts

This week’s question:

My husband is getting up in years and I am not sure he has the legal ability to sign a Living Trust. He can be so forgetful, it’s scary. He still knows me, our children and our properties, but how can I tell if it is OK for him to sign legal documents?

/s/Mary M

Dear Mary–

This is a very important topic, Mary, and one that is not easily summarized.

Let me begin by mentioning a few important California Probate Code sections, in this the first part of a two-part series.

§810 states that there shall exist a rebuttable presumption affecting the burden of proof that all persons have the capacity to make decisions and to be responsible for their acts or decisions. So, this is one of many factors to look at.

Next, a person who has a mental or physical disorder may still be capable of contracting, conveying, marrying, making medical decisions, executing wills or trusts, and performing other actions.

Also, a judicial determination that a person is totally without understanding, or is of unsound mind, or suffers from one or more mental deficits so substantial that, under the circumstances, the person should be deemed to lack the legal capacity to perform a specific act, should be based on evidence of a deficit in one or more of the person’s mental functions rather than on a diagnosis of a person’s mental or physical disorder.

Of course a doctor may need to help with this assessment.

Deficits in mental functions are defined in §811. Deficits in mental functions include alertness and attention, including, but not limited to, the level of arousal or consciousness and orientation to time, place, person, and situation.

Other issues include information processing, including, but not limited to short- and long-term memory, including immediate recall, the ability to understand or communicate with others, either verbally or otherwise and recognition of familiar objects and familiar persons.

In looking at legal mental capacity, one would be interested in the ability to understand and appreciate quantities, the ability to reason using abstract concepts, and the ability to plan, organize, and carry out actions in one’s own rational self-interest.

Of course, the ability to reason logically is important. Deficits in these functions may be demonstrated by the presence of severely disorganized thinking, hallucinations, delusions and/or uncontrollable, repetitive, or intrusive thoughts.

Other deficits in mental functions could be listed, and the court may take into consideration the frequency, severity, and duration of periods of impairment.

Thanks for writing in, Mary. Be on the lookout for Part 2 of this topic in about two weeks.

/s/Donald J. DeVries

Almaden Valley

Read our Terms of Use.

 

Differences Between “Revocable” And “Irrevocable” Trusts Explained

This week’s question:

My parents live here in the Almaden Valley and they have a living trust. My sister and I are very curious about what the trust says but our parents say politely that it is none of our business. Since our parents have said that my sister and I are the beneficiaries of the trust and receive everything when they pass on, can’t we have a copy of the trust and know all about it?

/s/Jimmy J.
Almaden Valley

Dear Jimmy– 

You and your sister have some good questions, but your parents’ business may be just that.

Since your parents are still living and presumably of “sound mind,” they can presumably revoke (i.e., change, modify, or cancel) any part of their trust. It is typically revocable during their lifetime.

Once one of your parents passes on, usually the trust becomes “irrevocable” as to the deceased person’s share, i.e., fixed, permanent, unchangeable.

Revocable living trusts are something like a will. And just as a will “speaks” only as of the date of the testator’s death, a revocable trust confers enforceable property interests in the beneficiaries only at the time it becomes irrevocable. Prior to that time, those beneficiaries have no rights to the trust property, and thus no say in how it is managed. Or even what is in the trust.

California Probate Code §15800 sets forth the rule: “Except to the extent that the trust instrument otherwise provides or where the joint action of the settlor [creator of the trust] and all beneficiaries is required, during the time that a trust is revocable and the person holding the power to revoke the trust is competent: (1) The person holding the power to revoke, and not the beneficiary, has the rights afforded beneficiaries under this division.”

Any interest that beneficiaries of a revocable trust have in trust property is “merely potential” and can “evaporate in a moment at the whim of the settlor.” A settlor with revocation power retains the power and control of the trust estate and can with a stoke of the pen divest the beneficiaries of their interest.

Be sure to discuss the above general principles with your own attorney to see how they may apply to your own situation. There is really no substitute for that.

You may also find a recent case helpful online, decided September 27, 2011. Go to your favorite search engine and enter: Estate of William A. Giraldin or Christine Giraldin v. Timothy Giraldin. It should be up on your screen in a heartbeat. It may be a little tedious, but it’s good reading.

/s/Donald J. DeVries
Almaden Valley

Read our Terms of Use.

Suing Your Lawyer After You Lost Your Case May Be Difficult

This week’s question:

I went to court with my attorney two months ago and we just received the decision in the mail. We lost. My attorney told me she thought we were going to win. Can I sue her for legal malpractice?

/s/Vanessa V.
Almaden Valley

Dear Vanessa—

As in so many situations, Vanessa, it all depends on the situation. Just because you lost your case does not necessarily mean you have a viable legal practice case, and/or one that is worth pursuing.

First of all, you need to have grounds for a legal malpractice case. Some of those grounds are listed in common jury instructions that a trial judge might read to the jury in that kind of case.

For example, the standard of care is covered by CACI 600 which states:

“An attorney is negligent if he or she fails to use the skill and care that a reasonably careful attorney would have used in similar circumstances.”

“When you are deciding whether the attorney was negligent, you must base your decision only on the testimony of the expert witnesses, who have testified in this case.”

And then, to recover money damages, the trial judge might read CACI 601 to the jury:

“To recover damages from the attorney, plaintiff must prove that plaintiff would have obtained a better result if the attorney had acted as a reasonably careful attorney.”

Another jury instruction relates to “success.”

It reads as follows:

“Success Not Required. An attorney is not necessarily negligent just because his or her efforts are unsuccessful or he or she makes an error that was reasonable under the circumstances. An attorney is negligent only if he or she was not as skillful, knowledgeable, or careful as other attorneys would have been in similar circumstances.”

It is also common to look at different strategies or legal decisions that were involved in the case, but an attorney is not necessarily negligent just because he or she chooses one legal strategy or makes a decision and it turns out that another strategy or decision would have been a better choice.

Also, a referral to a legal specialist may be important.

“Referral to Legal Specialist. If a reasonably careful attorney in a similar situation would have referred plaintiff to a legal specialist, then the attorney was negligent if he or she did not do so.”

“However, if defendant attorney handled the matter with as much skill and care as a reasonable legal specialist would have, then defendant attorney was not negligent.”

Best wishes in pursuing this, Vanessa. I regret your case did not turn out so well for you.

/s/Donald J. DeVries
Almaden Valley

 

Read our Terms of Use.

Defamation Of Character May Be Serious

This week’s question:

I live in a neighborhood where everybody seems to know everybody else. My problem is that one of my neighbors has said some very mean, untrue things about me in the neighborhood that have been reported to me. I am very upset about this and I want to file suit for these falsehoods. What do I need to prove to win?

/s/Alan A.
Almaden Valley
Dear Alan—

What you may be thinking about is a law suit for “defamation.” Generally speaking, “defamation” is an invasion of the interest in reputation.

In California, defamation is committed by either libel or slander, according to Civil Code §44.

Libel is a false and unprivileged publication by writing, printing, picture, effigy, or other fixed representation to the eye, which exposes any person to hatred, contempt, ridicule, or obloquy, or which causes him to be shunned or avoided, or which has a tendency to injure him in his occupation. This is according to Civil Code §45.

Slander is a false and unprivileged publication, orally uttered, and also communications by radio or any mechanical or other means which:

1. Charges any person with crime, or with having been indicted, convicted, or punished for crime;

2. Imputes in him the present existence of an infectious, contagious, or loathsome disease;

3. Tends directly to injure him in respect to his office, profession, trade or business, either by imputing to him general  disqualification in those respects which the office or other occupation peculiarly requires, or by imputing something with reference to his office, profession, trade, or business that has a natural tendency to lessen its profits;

4. Imputes to him impotence or a want of chastity; or

5. Which, by natural consequence, causes actual damage.

Defamation is classified as a “tort,” i.e. any wrong, not consisting in a “mere” breach of contract, for which the law undertakes to give to the injured party some appropriate remedy against the wrongdoer.

The elements of the tort of defamation consist of these factors: (a) a publication that is (b) false, (c) defamatory, and (d) unprivileged, and that (e) has a natural tendency to injure or that causes special damage.

The defamatory material must be “published,” i.e., communicated to some third person who understands its defamatory meaning and application to the plaintiff (the one who brings the law suit). If the defamatory statement is published only to the plaintiff, it is not “published” to a third person.

Almaden Times readers can review the above California Civil Code sections referenced above by going online and entering the code section in their search boxes and hitting “go.” For example, California Civil Code Section 44.

/s/Donald J. DeVries
Almaden Valley

 
Read our Terms of Use.

Why It’s Good To See Your Own Attorney





 

 

This week’s question:

 

I have been reading your column for years and one thing bugs

me, and that is why you always say you need to see your own attorney? 

Can’t you just answer simple questions and leave it at that, even over

the telephone? Aren’t you just trying to build up business for the legal

establishment?

 

/s/Amanda A.

Almaden Valley

 

Dear Amanda—

 

I hear what you are saying, Amanda, and I will try to

address your concerns and frustration. Maybe some attorneys will answer

questions for new clients over the telephone, but I think most of us will not

and for very good reasons.

 

If an attorney “just answers questions” over the

telephone, an important relationship is undoubtedly created—the attorney

client relationship. This is a very important relationship in our society, and

the attorney must do a good job for the client.

 

It is important that the attorney is made aware of all of

the key facts and circumstances of that particular situation, and that is

rather difficult to do during a short telephone call or email at the outset. 

If something is not covered and should be covered, a key part of the legal

advice given to the client may be incorrect. 

 

For example, let’s say that you call an attorney who

you do not know and ask about the statute of limitations (deadline to file

suit) for a breach of written contract involving $100,000. Let’s assume

further that the attorney says on the telephone “four years” and

hangs up.

 

Let us take our hypothetical one step further and say that

based on that call, you as a client took no action on that breach of written

contract case because you thought it was too late to do anything about it. 

 

You might have grounds for a $100,000 legal malpractice suit

against the attorney if you learned later that the four-year period for filing

suit on a written contract does not run against a defendant if he or she is out

of state under California Code of Civil Procedure §351. (And assume that

nothing was said about the one-year absent defendant during the telephone

call.)

 

This is just one example of a number of things that may come

up that your attorney needs to consider. And this is just one example of why

most attorneys do not just come to the telephone and “answer

questions”.

 

After the case or transaction is underway, of course,

attorneys do a lot of work by telephone and email, but probably not at the

outset until the basics are covered.

 

/s/Donald J. DeVries

Almaden Valley

 

Donald J. DeVries is an attorney practicing law in the Almaden Valley. Past Almaden Times articles since 1986 can be accessed through

his web site: www.almadenvalleylawers.com

If you would like him to answer your question in his next Almaden Times column, you can reach him by

email at don@almadenvalleylawyers.com,

with “Almaden Times” in the subject line, fax at (408)268-6502, telephone

at (408)268-9500, or mail at DeVries & Horowitz, 6475 Camden Avenue, Suite

200, San Jose, CA 95120. Your matters are personal and private, so of course,

he will not disclose your identity or any details about your situation. Mr.

DeVries writes this column to provide you with general information about

important legal matters affecting California

residents—not to give you legal advice about your specific matter. No

attorney-client relationship is created by these articles. The law is complex

and constantly changing and varies from state to state. So you should consult

an attorney before taking any action that would affect your personal or

business matters.

 

Spouses May Get Their Separate Property Back





 

This week’s question:

 

I had a house before my wife and I were married. I sold

that house before we were married and put all of the net proceeds into our

present house, more than $100,000. It may be necessary for us to sell our

present house and go our separate ways, even though the economy might not be

the best. Is my $100,000 gone through a gift to our present community or do I

get that back?

 

/s/Jack J.

Almaden Valley

 

Dear Jack—

 

You have emailed in a very interesting question, Jack. Two

short answers come to mind and then a longer one.

 

The first short answer is that you really need to see your

own attorney on this one since every case is different and very “fact

specific” as we say. The second short answer ties in with the

first—it really all depends.

 

Now for the longer answer.

 

One thing you want to consider is the status of title. If

your deed reads in your names as joint tenants then the house is presumed to

be community property
under California Family Code §2581. But

don’t panic, because that presumption can be rebutted. It is not a conclusive presumption.

 

Family Code §2581 states that property generally in joint

form acquired during the marriage is presumed

to be community property but that can be rebutted.

 

Another very important Family Code provision is §2640. That

law states that the party shall be reimbursed for that party’s contributions to

the acquisition of property of the community property estate to the extent the

party traces the contributions to a separate property source.
(Except

where the party has waived in writing the right to be reimbursed.)



Obviously, the above paragraph contains a very important

rule. And that pertains to tracing. So, you will want to get out all of your

paperwork and trace or track back to prove that your $100,000 came from the

prior marriage, i.e. your own separate property in this marriage. 

 

If you can trace it or prove it, you may get credit for it

in the present property division. Under Family Code §2640 it would be

“without interest or adjustment for change in monetary values”,

i.e., inflation, but those often are minor details.

 

In cases of extensive appreciation and/or loan pay-down over

a number of years, your attorney may need to set up a proportion to compute the

increased value to the community compared with your separate property

contribution. That’s why it is always best to consult with your own

attorney concerning issues of this nature.

 

Good luck, Jack. I hope it all works out OK.

 

/s/Donald J. DeVries

Almaden Valley

 

Donald J. DeVries is an attorney practicing law in the

Almaden Valley. Past Almaden Times articles

since 1986 can be accessed through his web site: www.almadenvalleylawyers.com. If

you would like him to answer your question in his next Almaden Times column, you can reach him by

email at don@almadenvalleylawyers.com,

with “Almaden Times” in the subject line, fax at (408)268-6502,

telephone at (408)268-9500, or mail at DeVries & Horowitz, 6475 Camden

Avenue, Suite 200, San Jose, CA 95120. Your matters are personal and private,

so of course, he will not disclose your identity or any details about your

situation. Mr. DeVries writes this column to provide you with general

information about important legal matters affecting California

residents—not to give you legal advice about your specific matter. No

attorney-client relationship is created by these articles. The law is complex

and constantly changing and varies from state to state. So you should consult

an attorney before taking any action that would affect your personal or

business matters.

 

 

How To Know Which Trial Expert Witness To Believe





 

How To Know Which Trial



Expert Witness To Believe



 



 



This week’s question:



 



Maybe I have been watching too much TV, but expert witnesses

in various cases really are confusing. For example, one forensic expert

says one thing, and then the other one says just the opposite! How can we

know which one is more truthful?



 



/s/Kelly K.



Almaden Valley



 



Dear Kelly—



 



I would hazard a guess that each expert would be

“truthful” but the key question is which one is more credible or believable and why.



 



In jury trials, the trial judge may read certain

instructions to the jury that deal with expert witnesses. One of those

instructions is CACI 219 that reads as follows:



 



“EXPERT-WITNESS TESTIMONY. During the trial you

heard testimony from expert witnesses. The law allows an expert to state

opinions about matters in his or her field of expertise even if he or she has

not witnessed any of the events involved in the trial.”



 



“You do not have to accept an expert’s

opinion. As with any other witness, it is up to you to decide whether you

believe the expert’s testimony and choose to use it as a basis for your

decision. You may believe all, part, or none of an expert’s

testimony. In deciding whether to believe an expert’s testimony,

you should consider:



 



            1. 

The expert’s training and experience;



            2. 

The facts the expert relied on; and



            3. 

The reasons for the expert’s opinion.”



 



Another jury instruction that is often read to the jury is

CACI 220. It provides as follows:



           



“EXPERTS-QUESTIONS CONTAINING ASSUMED FACTS. The

law allows expert witnesses to be asked questions that are based on assumed

facts. These are sometimes called ‘hypothetical

questions.’”



 



“In determining the weight to give to the

expert’s opinion that is based on the assumed facts, you should consider

whether the assumed facts are true.”



 



Finally, the following instruction might be helpful when

there is a conflict in what the experts are saying, as found in CACI 221:



 



“CONFLICTING EXPERT TESTIMONY. If the expert

witnesses disagreed with one another, you should weigh each opinion against the

others. You should examine the reasons given for each opinion and the

facts or other matters that each witness relied on. You may also compare

the expert’s qualifications.”



 



Having read and considered the above, it is important to

note that sometimes it is not easy to believe one expert over the other. 

Some cases are very difficult in that regard and some cases are won or lost

because of crucial expert witness testimony.



 



All the juror can do is their best. That’s all

we can ask for, while we say “thank you” for participating in our

system of justice which is the best on planet earth.



 



/s/Donald J. DeVries



Almaden Valley



 



You can reach Mr. DeVries with your questions by email at don@almadenvalleylawyers.com,

with “Almaden Times” in the subject line, fax at (408)268-6502,

telephone at (408)268-9500, or mail at DeVries & Horowitz, 6475 Camden

Avenue, Suite 200, San Jose, CA 95120. Your name will not be used. No

attorney-client relationship is created by these articles.